>> > Named parameters is good feature, but what about the syntax in the
>> > sample, O also do not like it. If we use named parameters, it should be
>> > something like:
>> >
>> > S = 'INSERT INTO TTT VALUES (:a, :b, :a)';
>> > EXECUTE STATEMENT S (a=CURRENT_TRANSACTION, b=CURRENT_CONNECTION);
>>
>> Hmm... now i see where confusion is. I'll look how to implement such
>> syntax
>
> Vlad, I do not pretend that syntax to be the ideal, just gave an example
> looking better for me compared with initial one. MAy be should be discussed a
> bit. Or at least wait 2 or 3 days before starting to rewrite the code:)

I never start to (re)write something immediately just because of new idea ;)

Regards,
Vlad