On Monday 10 December 2007 18:09, Vlad Khorsun wrote:

> ....
>
> > Named parameters is good feature, but what about the syntax in the
> > sample, O also do not like it. If we use named parameters, it should be
> > something like:
> >
> > S = 'INSERT INTO TTT VALUES (:a, :b, :a)';
> > EXECUTE STATEMENT S (a=CURRENT_TRANSACTION, b=CURRENT_CONNECTION);
>
> Hmm... now i see where confusion is. I'll look how to implement such
> syntax

Vlad, I do not pretend that syntax to be the ideal, just gave an example
looking better for me compared with initial one. MAy be should be discussed a
bit. Or at least wait 2 or 3 days before starting to rewrite the code:)