Alex Peshkov escreveu:

> On Monday 10 December 2007 18:09, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
>
>> ....
>>
>>
>>> Named parameters is good feature, but what about the syntax in the
>>> sample, O also do not like it. If we use named parameters, it should be
>>> something like:
>>>
>>> S = 'INSERT INTO TTT VALUES (:a, :b, :a)';
>>> EXECUTE STATEMENT S (a=CURRENT_TRANSACTION, b=CURRENT_CONNECTION);
>>>
>> Hmm... now i see where confusion is. I'll look how to implement such
>> syntax
>>
>
> Vlad, I do not pretend that syntax to be the ideal, just gave an example
> looking better for me compared with initial one. MAy be should be discussed a
> bit. Or at least wait 2 or 3 days before starting to rewrite the code:)

Don't introduce ambiguities with boolean expressions, please. :-)


Adriano