Subject Re: [Firebird-Architect] External engines - security
Author Adriano dos Santos Fernandes
Roman Rokytskyy escreveu:
> Guys,
>>> Do you want to say that UDF may be secure in one database, but insecure in
>>> another?
>> Do you have any doubt? :-)
>> Actually it's a problem even for different users of the same database.
>> [...]
>> Do you think a digital signature function should be so unprotected?
>> This is one of things I'm using in Oracle, and I'm satisfied with they
>> security.
> I suggest to stop here - if you want to discuss Firebird'd security in
> general (and what you show is a column-level permissions on the metadata
> objects), create a separate thread and invite Red Soft into it, they
> have a lot of input for the topic.
Yes, Roman, I also suggest to stop here.

It's impossible to extend the engine for external procedures with
current FB security handling.