Leyne, Sean wrote:

>> Don't we have a mechanism for creating transaction ids? Do we really
>> need two different ones - one of which uses a generator so it can be
>> bumped or reset?
>
> The problem with the current transaction id is that it is reset with a
> database restore.

That's not a problem - generally, that's a salvation, given that we've
got 32 bit transaction ids.

>
> The generator approach ensures that the ID is unique across restores.

What problem requires that solution?


Regards,


Ann