Subject Re: [Firebird-Architect] Vulcan services part II
Author Dimitry Sibiryakov
On 11 May 2006 at 12:27, Arno Brinkman wrote:

>>>Yes, and were discussing which method to use, but for backwards
>>>compatibilty this must be supported inside services provider.
>Backwards compatibility of "isc_info_svc_svr_db_info" info item in the

I'm sorry, but there is no relation between backwards compatibility
of "isc_info_svc_svr_db_info" info item and implementing it in
separate services provider. I'd even say that separate provider is
the worst place for it.
On contrary, Y-valve is almost ideal one because it has full list
of connections, including handles for each connection and can gather
all needed information from these connections using separate
isc_database_info(db_id) calls for each connection.

SY, Dimitry Sibiryakov.