On 11 May 2006 at 10:36, Arno Brinkman wrote:

>> I mean utilities embedded in engine as threaded services. Why they
>> call Y-valve instead of internal engine classes? Just because Jim
>> decided to extract them to a separate provider?
>
>Because else you bind services provider directly to an engine, this is
>not what we want.

"We"? Who exactly is "we"? At least Roman and I think that some
part of services provider _must_ be binded (I'd even say embedded) to
an engine. Not whole, but quite definite part.

--
SY, Dimitry Sibiryakov.