Subject Re: [Firebird-Architect] Vulcan services part II
Author Dmitry Yemanov
"Arno Brinkman" <fbsupport@...> wrote:
> That's almost the same as proposal 3 :-)


> Except that you walk through the active providers and give no nodePath.

Active or all providers - it doesn't matter, a provider should know whether
its active or not :-) As for the nodePath, I consider fb_engine_info()
mostly a backend for the SAPI and I don't see much value in calling it as a
separate API call. But I have no serious objections to the nodePath argument
either, provided that the services manager will always pass NULL there :-)