Subject Re: [Firebird-Architect] Vulcan services part II
Author Dimitry Sibiryakov
On 11 May 2006 at 10:45, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:

>> And I don't see any reason why utilities may need to call Y-valve.
>
>They do it now.

I mean utilities embedded in engine as threaded services. Why they
call Y-valve instead of internal engine classes? Just because Jim
decided to extract them to a separate provider?

--
SY, Dimitry Sibiryakov.