"Roman Rokytskyy" <rrokytskyy@...> wrote:

>
> No, I think that either you're wrong here or you did not understand
> the proposed change.

Me neither. When you talk about the Y-valve implementing SAPI, I'm confused.

> Dispatcher won't execute the backup call, but as before, route it to
> the appropriate provider which will be determined from the SPB.

SPB parsing does not belong to the Y-valve, IMO.

> The provider on the client side won't be able to do any backup or gfix
> things - those are tasks for the engine providers.

I don't like it. Why functions of the utility become something that the
engine should handle?


Dmitry