= m. Th = wrote:

> 1. Transaction %d is the transaction which holds the resource or "our"
> transaction? IMHO, is better to write both numbers in the message...
>

The one that holds the lock. Our transaction number is already
accessible, no need to report it.

> 2. What if you have more than two transactions in a deadlock IOW
> "deadly-embrace"?
>

My proposal is to address update_conflict, and not deadlock in general.


Adriano