Vlad Horsun wrote:

>> Why not use the the table column type?
>> Oracle has this feature:
>>
>> Columname table.column%type;
>>
>
> I also like it. But without "%type" :) I.e.
>
> DECLARE <varname> TYPE OF <tablename>.<columnname>
>
> Adriano, what do you think ?
>

The functionality and the syntax looks great to me, if future schemas
shares the same namespace as tables, to not have ambiguity.


Adriano