Subject | RE: Re: [Firebird-Architect] RFC: Clustering |
---|---|
Author | Gary T. Benner |
Post date | 2006-11-18T02:04:41Z |
[Reply]
HI all,
At 04:32 on 18/11/2006 Jim wrote
Given the need from time to time to take an individual machine down, clustering, appears to be the logical way to go. I can already achieve that easily with web servers (Linux Virtual Server Project), but database servers are a different matter all together.
kind regards
Gary
Ref#: 41006
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
HI all,
At 04:32 on 18/11/2006 Jim wrote
>Jim, I'd appreciate your considered opinion as to the best strategy for achieving (IMHO) the essential goal of clustering, that being "continuity of service". especially in Web Server applications where 24 x 7 uptime (or as near to as humanly possible) is required.
>As the first person to implement a cluster based database design >(Rdb/ELN), I've rather lost faith in cluster technology. Like invading >other countries, it looks good on paper, but the details and >implementation ramifications makes achieving the stated goal very difficult.
Given the need from time to time to take an individual machine down, clustering, appears to be the logical way to go. I can already achieve that easily with web servers (Linux Virtual Server Project), but database servers are a different matter all together.
kind regards
Gary
Ref#: 41006
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]