Me too. Neat trick to shutdown a machine leaving a server process running.

Fabiano Bonin wrote:

> I would like to know how, too
>
> On 10/30/06, Erik LaBianca <erik@...> wrote:
>
>> Alex Peshkov wrote:
>>
>>> Erik LaBianca:
>>>
>>>> A superserver system will never be able
>>>> to continue serving requests through a hardware failure, whereas
>>>>
>> classic
>>
>>>> operating on a cluster could do so.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Sorry, Erik, but it does. A number of clients of our company use SS
>>> fail-resistant clusters for last 4 years. Even without expensive shared
>>> storage.
>>>
>>>
>> How? Shadow databases on NFS? With that architecture you'll still have
>> to delegate a master database to receive all write traffic and
>> communicate it to the clients... I've certainly not seen any such
>> solution documented...
>>
>>