"Claudio Valderrama C." <cvalde@...> wrote:

>
> What strikes me here (and I'm not trying to be funny) is that you are the
> guardian of the tradition, the keeper of the OSRI manual and the
> self-appointed architect. You taught us to not hack the code, to think

twice

> before going for a solution, to not do changes that will be regretted

later.

> However, you are offering now an ugly hack to implement a feature just for
> having less work. I think this is unacceptable.
>
> Sincerely: why don't you make a list of all changes that need to be done

to

> implement the feature in a more decent way instead? True, it won't be

coded

> this weekend, but after FB3 merging is complete, with your guidance,

people

> will start working on it even if 70 files have to be changed. And it will

be

> extensible, elegant and unambiguous.

Ditto. Exactly what I feel.


Dmitry