Subject | Re: [Firebird-Architect] Multi-level name space |
---|---|
Author | Jim Starkey |
Post date | 2006-01-13T16:54:06Z |
Martijn Tonies wrote:
RDB$RELATION_FIELDS, and RDB$FIELDS continue to work. (This was
discussed earlier)
--
Jim Starkey
Netfrastructure, Inc.
978 526-1376
>>fyi:Backwards compatibility -- so existing joins between RDB$RELATIONS,
>>
>> "create table Tables (\
>> tableName varchar (128) not null,\
>> schema varchar (128) not null,\
>>
>>
>
>
>Here I see two columns for a two-level namespace.
>
>What would be your reason for Firebird not having two columns, but
>a VARCHAR(256) column?
>
>
>
RDB$RELATION_FIELDS, and RDB$FIELDS continue to work. (This was
discussed earlier)
--
Jim Starkey
Netfrastructure, Inc.
978 526-1376