Arno Brinkman wrote:

>>My only question is "Is VARCHAR(256) enough, would VARCHAR(512) cause
>>any problems?" Then one can have large UNICODE names as well and we do
>>not have to worry about another increase later?
>
> I'm afraid the BLR doesn't support this, that's why 255 is suggested.

It's probably big enough at 255 - I was thinking ahead more to having a
full machine path rather than just a schema name ;)

--
Lester Caine
-----------------------------
L.S.Caine Electronic Services
Treasurer - Firebird Foundation Inc.