"Jim Starkey" <jas@...> wrote:

>
> It seems too simple. What am I missing?

What you've described can be achieved with (1) only - just extend the name
and allow people to use whatever separator they like.

I think that people need to see advantages of the namespaces over just long
names. For example, an ability to specify a default namespace on a per
connection basis? Perhaps anything else? Please show us those benefits first
and then we'll get back to your implementation proposal.


Dmitry