Subject | Re: [Firebird-Architect] Database Capabilities |
---|---|
Author | Dmitry Sibiryakov |
Post date | 2005-07-22T12:55Z |
On 22 Jul 2005 at 7:27, Jim Starkey wrote:
database connections into one connection string.
two-phased. First, client connects to server (op_connect) and then
attach to database (op_attach).
Everything we need to implement 'capabilities+attach' is fish out
server attachment from the dark pool. If we do so,
'capabilities+attach' will be much cheaper than
'attach+capabilities+re-attach'.
--
SY, Dimitry Sibiryakov.
>You obviously have to connect to the database with a connection stringNow I have to, of course. But only because you married server and
>before anything could happen.
database connections into one connection string.
>The cost of capabilities + attach is much greater than attach +As far as I can read sources, standard database attach procedure is
>capabilities, which is the standard case.
two-phased. First, client connects to server (op_connect) and then
attach to database (op_attach).
Everything we need to implement 'capabilities+attach' is fish out
server attachment from the dark pool. If we do so,
'capabilities+attach' will be much cheaper than
'attach+capabilities+re-attach'.
--
SY, Dimitry Sibiryakov.