> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ann W. Harrison
>
> OK, let me see if I understand where we currently are on the walking
> backward issue. There may be a solution lurking that doesn't prevent
> releasing index pages, at the expense of some repositioning logic for
> right to left traversal.
>
> There's no point in retrofitting this stuff to old indexes. New indexes
> sort duplicates by record number, which turns out to be important.

I had the idea this record number sorting didn't happen for unique indices
or did I misread some explanation in the code?

C.