> Someone clever - probably Vlad, though I didn't find the message in a
> quick search - suggested that we keep a separate "oldest active blob"
> number. I've been thinking about that since and think there is a
> solution there that will limit the effect of read-committed transactions
> on garbage collection and still get right answers.

That was not me. And i did not liked idea at the first look
...

> But how? More tomorrow.

Very interesting, i'm all ears ;)

Regards,
Vlad