|Subject||Re: [Firebird-Architect] Re: Can we, can we, can we????...|
> >>>1) questions about API remained openOh bugger... But - with Vulcan - does Classic have a future at all?
> >>>2) it doesn't work in classic mode
> >>Bah... :-)
> > On second thought, I don't give a rats ass about (2) :-)
> > Code it! ;-)
> different rats feel differently about different asses. InterBase
> dropped classic. Firebird and Vulcan have turned it back into a viable
> architecture - a necessary architecture if we're going to support
> clusters well. Unless a feature works in both shared server and
> classic, it's not a feature.
And why wouldn't the solution work with Classic, because it needs
a 2nd connection?
Database Workbench - tool for InterBase, Firebird, MySQL, Oracle & MS SQL