Subject | Re: [Firebird-Architect] Re: Can we, can we, can we????... |
---|---|
Author | Martijn Tonies |
Post date | 2005-06-16T15:27:30Z |
> >>>1) questions about API remained openOh bugger... But - with Vulcan - does Classic have a future at all?
> >>>2) it doesn't work in classic mode
> >>
> >>Bah... :-)
> >
> >
> > On second thought, I don't give a rats ass about (2) :-)
> >
> > Code it! ;-)
> >
>
> different rats feel differently about different asses. InterBase
> dropped classic. Firebird and Vulcan have turned it back into a viable
> architecture - a necessary architecture if we're going to support
> clusters well. Unless a feature works in both shared server and
> classic, it's not a feature.
And why wouldn't the solution work with Classic, because it needs
a 2nd connection?
With regards,
Martijn Tonies
Database Workbench - tool for InterBase, Firebird, MySQL, Oracle & MS SQL
Server
Upscene Productions
http://www.upscene.com