| Subject | Re: [Firebird-Architect] Re: Can we, can we, can we????... |
|---|---|
| Author | Ann W. Harrison |
| Post date | 2005-06-16T14:14:05Z |
Martijn
dropped classic. Firebird and Vulcan have turned it back into a viable
architecture - a necessary architecture if we're going to support
clusters well. Unless a feature works in both shared server and
classic, it's not a feature.
Regards,
Ann
Opinions in this message, however correct, are those of the writer.
>>>different rats feel differently about different asses. InterBase
>>>1) questions about API remained open
>>>2) it doesn't work in classic mode
>>
>>Bah... :-)
>
>
> On second thought, I don't give a rats ass about (2) :-)
>
> Code it! ;-)
>
dropped classic. Firebird and Vulcan have turned it back into a viable
architecture - a necessary architecture if we're going to support
clusters well. Unless a feature works in both shared server and
classic, it's not a feature.
Regards,
Ann
Opinions in this message, however correct, are those of the writer.