|Subject||Re: [Firebird-Architect] Can we, can we, can we????...|
"Vlad Horsun" <hvlad@...> wrote:
>This is an attachment what's blocked from user's POV, hence the suggestion.
> May be transaction_id is better than attachment_id ?
> And how about possible vulnerability when some bad boy will callisc_cancel_xxx
> for all numbers from 1 to 1000000 ? I think - only i (and possible SYSDBA)can
> cancel my running request.Of course.
> PS BTW, if we'll have ability to cancel running request - we can implementlibrary
> timeouts (attacment\transaction\request level) directly in client