"Vlad Horsun" <hvlad@...> wrote:

>
> May be transaction_id is better than attachment_id ?

This is an attachment what's blocked from user's POV, hence the suggestion.

> And how about possible vulnerability when some bad boy will call

isc_cancel_xxx

> for all numbers from 1 to 1000000 ? I think - only i (and possible SYSDBA)

can

> cancel my running request.

Of course.

> PS BTW, if we'll have ability to cancel running request - we can implement
> timeouts (attacment\transaction\request level) directly in client

library

Good point.


Dmitry