Subject | Re: [Firebird-Architect] Can we, can we, can we????... |
---|---|
Author | Ann W. Harrison |
Post date | 2005-06-14T18:23:35Z |
Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
And gradually we (with Borland following in our footsteps) are making
the special gbak options available to other applications on the (very
reasonable to me) grounds that if gbak needs a capability, other
applications also need it.
Regards,
Ann
>Added over my dead body... at least dead to Borland..
>>And no, it's not a good idea to put in a special switch that lets gbak
>>ignore the system rules.
>
> GBAK already does this quite often ;-)
>
And gradually we (with Borland following in our footsteps) are making
the special gbak options available to other applications on the (very
reasonable to me) grounds that if gbak needs a capability, other
applications also need it.
Regards,
Ann