Subject | Re: [Firebird-Architect] Can we, can we, can we????... |
---|---|
Author | Jim Starkey |
Post date | 2005-06-14T11:31:01Z |
Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
the database block once of second, so no system call is necessary to
poll elapsed time.
I continue to think that elapsed time is a remarkable poor way to handle
this.
>"Jim Starkey" <jas@...> wrote:The cheap way to handle this is a ticker threat that bumps a counter in
>
>
>> 2. How exactly are we going to track execution time of a request?
>>
>>
>
>Elapsed time. Every request has a timestamp of its beginning. Then we get
>the current time in the looper and compare.
>
>
>
>> 3. What are the implications on system performance in tracking and
>> probing request execution time?
>>
>>
>
>Subject of measuring, but I doubt it will be noticable.
>
>
>
>
the database block once of second, so no system call is necessary to
poll elapsed time.
I continue to think that elapsed time is a remarkable poor way to handle
this.