On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 20:41:50 -0400, Jim Starkey <jas@...>
wrote:

>
> OK, let's look at that. There are two problems with
> isc_unwind_request. One is that it doesn't work on SQL statements, the
> other is that it doesn't actually work.
>
> New model:
>
> 1. isc_statement_info makes a available a request "token"
> 2. The "request token" is used in a separate connection to kill a
> running request. Dpb parameter? New statement? Don't care --
> anything would work.
> 3. A polite request to kill an active request with a given token is
> honored as long as the attachment accounts were the same.
>

I like that idea :) .

Cheers,
--
Miroslav Penchev