On Tue, 17 May 2005 16:48:23 +0200, Martijn Tonies <m.tonies@...>
wrote:

>> I think the answer is either more appropriate compression schemes or
>> forgoing blob compression.
>
> How about the client decompression?
>

I was thinking that this is initial idea or I am forgetting too soon (or
discussion is too long ;) )

Cheers,
--
Miroslav Penchev