Svend Meyland Nicolaisen wrote:

>If your native character set is based on Unicode then I would find it
>strange not to use a compliant Unicode collation that takes all the
>necessary code points into account. Why use Unicode and not be truely
>Unicode compliant?
>
>
>

I have no interest in character set politics, but I rather be compliant
with what the people who use an application think is appropriate than
what the Unicode Association thought was good for them. If somebody
tells me what collation they want, that's about the end of it.

--

Jim Starkey
Netfrastructure, Inc.
978 526-1376