And this was just a silly question... ;-)

On Wed, 02 Mar 2005 09:51:43 +0400, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:

>
>On 1 Mar 2005 at 5:35, Fabricio Araujo wrote:
>
>>Silly question to the collection:
>>Why other dbs just waited almost twenty years to implement
>>record versioning?
>
> IMHO, locking architecture is simplier to implement and faster for
>most oerations. BTW, Oracle didn't wait twenty years, but their
>versioning is (was?) not complete - they keep only two versions.
>--
> SY, Dimitry Sibiryakov.
>
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>