Subject | Re: Firebird Remote Protocol |
---|---|
Author | Roman Rokytskyy |
Post date | 2005-12-07T16:21:25Z |
Jim,
too. I fully support it, since it gives us the required flexibility
and most likely the amount of changes is minimal.
Now, how do we define batches? Some method call isc_start_batch?
Roman
> Rather than complicate the protocol with various combined requests,would > let a single message of { start_transaction, allocate statement,
> why not allow batching of requests into a single message? This
> prepare statement, execute, fetch, fetch, fetch }. The server wouldAfter hitting the "Send" button I started to think about this idea
> batch the responses (until one failed, of course). This would allow
> arbitrary and open ended batching of request types.
too. I fully support it, since it gives us the required flexibility
and most likely the amount of changes is minimal.
Now, how do we define batches? Some method call isc_start_batch?
Roman