unordained wrote:

>I know there's been talk of external functions, java VM's, namespaces, etc., but how much talk has
>there been about what a type system should look like in a good RDBMS? About what the term "domain"
>really means? Wouldn't the developer you task with adding geospatial datatypes find it more
>rewarding to open Firebird up to 3rd party datatype plugin development than to implement a single,
>complicated datatype in the current code?
>
>
>

Do you have something you'd like to propose?

--

Jim Starkey
Netfrastructure, Inc.
978 526-1376