Subject | Re: [Firebird-Architect] Re: Java Stored Procedures |
---|---|
Author | Martijn Tonies |
Post date | 2005-10-20T12:51:43Z |
> > Having the source code stored is a "plus" in my book.Thought so ;-)
> >
> > I'll opt for "invalid objects" again, like in Oracle. I like that.
> > It's also easier with regard to dependencies.
>
> Yup, but that would require to support "invalid objects" throughout
> the Firebird. Not an option for now.
> > > Questionable, since the compiled class often relies on theExcept that external classes could be not yours, while
> > > external libraries, which are located on the file system.
> >
> > Which can be "xcopied" as well.
>
> Then you have no problems when classes are not stored on the file
> system too - they can be "xcopied" too.
classes used by your database application and stored
procedures could be inside your database, which means
all stored application code can be inside your database.
> > Implement the SQL standard for blob values then...So?
> >
> > X' < hex values > '
>
> Yup, and get 3MB text file for a 1 MB jar... which depends on other
> jars. Sorry, but I do not support such ideas.Given that there's still NO way to insert/update binaries in a script,
I'd say it's about time this gets implemented.
With regards,
Martijn Tonies
Database Workbench - tool for InterBase, Firebird, MySQL, Oracle & MS SQL
Server
Upscene Productions
http://www.upscene.com
Database development questions? Check the forum!
http://www.databasedevelopmentforum.com