Alex Peshkov wrote:

>
>
>Let's ask another question - who sees any problems, restricting
>rdb$user_name to 31?
>
>
>
>

I think that is an incredibly stupid idea. Why would we want to do
that? I suspect that the current implementation has an across the board
restriction of 31 byte for identifiers, but I want to raise this to 128
characters anyway. What earthly good would restricting user identifiers
to 31 characters to 31 do?

--

Jim Starkey
Netfrastructure, Inc.
978 526-1376