Subject | Re: [Firebird-Architect] XNet and Connect Strings |
---|---|
Author | Jim Starkey |
Post date | 2005-10-05T14:10:56Z |
Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
process access". Shall we compromise on "server#"? This suggests that
the attachment will be handled by a server. You know, of course, that
this all invisible to users unless they choose to go grubbing through
the config file stuff.
--
Jim Starkey
Netfrastructure, Inc.
978 526-1376
>Please don't use string "xnet" as this is more an internal name rather than"Local" is easily confused between "local host access" and "local
>a public one (people speak TCP/IP not INet). I'd suggest the "local" prefix
>with some special character ("local#", "<local>" or anything else).
>
>
>
>
process access". Shall we compromise on "server#"? This suggests that
the attachment will be handled by a server. You know, of course, that
this all invisible to users unless they choose to go grubbing through
the config file stuff.
--
Jim Starkey
Netfrastructure, Inc.
978 526-1376