Subject | RE: [Firebird-Architect] XNet and Connect Strings |
---|---|
Author | Leyne, Sean |
Post date | 2005-10-04T17:49:26Z |
Jim,
XNet is intended to replace the existing local connection logic, which
doesn't require any special string.
How would a traditional local connection string be defined in the conf
file?
Sean
> When a connect string is passed to the remote provider, the remoteWhy would a special identifier be required for XNet?
> interface calls each protocol handler in turn to analyze the connect
> string and determine whether it should/can make a connection to a
> corresponding server...
XNet is intended to replace the existing local connection logic, which
doesn't require any special string.
How would a traditional local connection string be defined in the conf
file?
> ... does this seem like a good idea?Not at first glance. It seems unnecessary.
Sean