Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:

>Nando Dessena wrote:
>
>
>
>>I find it not much SQL-like. Dmitry's "ugly"
>>
>>value1 as param1, value2 as params2
>>
>>looks more adequate.
>>
>>
>>
>What about param1 is value1, param2 is value2?
>
>

Forget this. :-)