Subject | Re: [Firebird-Architect] XSQLDA/XSQLVAR issues |
---|---|
Author | Jim Starkey |
Post date | 2005-01-09T16:30:52Z |
Martijn Tonies wrote:
for discussion.
Maybe would should play a game. We'll call anyone who favors
"undefined" type A; anyone who favors a rule type B, and anyone who
favors an error, type C. I've come out of a type A. You're clearly a
type C. Can we guess were everyone else will fall?
Helen, I'd guess B. Paul, loosy-goosy, definitely an A. Dmitri likes
order, so I'll guess B. Like always, I haven't the slightest idea of
where Nickolay might land, but we can probably rule out A.
Other guesses?
>Actually, I disagree. IMO, it should raise an error so that it showsMartijn, if I thought everyone would agree, I wouldn't have raised it
>the user that there is a field "F2" in the table. That way, "undefined"
>behaviour can be avoided.
>
>
>
for discussion.
Maybe would should play a game. We'll call anyone who favors
"undefined" type A; anyone who favors a rule type B, and anyone who
favors an error, type C. I've come out of a type A. You're clearly a
type C. Can we guess were everyone else will fall?
Helen, I'd guess B. Paul, loosy-goosy, definitely an A. Dmitri likes
order, so I'll guess B. Like always, I haven't the slightest idea of
where Nickolay might land, but we can probably rule out A.
Other guesses?
>With regards,
>
>Martijn Tonies
>Database Workbench - developer tool for InterBase, Firebird, MySQL & MS SQL
>Server
>Upscene Productions
>http://www.upscene.com
>
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>