Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:

>Jim Starkey wrote:
>
>
>
>>This is well worth thinking about, particularly with regard to whether
>>this is something we might want to use for udf libraries, etc. Would
>>we, like apache2, have the root file simply end with a "include
>>$(root)/conf.d/*.conf"?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>I like the idea.
>
>
>And I have another feature request for config files: a new variable that
>expand to the path of the current config file.
>
>Something like: $(this)
>
>
>
>

That's an interesting idea. Like any software engineer, I have a moral
obligation to quibble with choice of keyword, but the concept is solid.
What would you use it for?