Dmitry Yemanov wrote:

>I expect to have some fun seeing you attacked by programmers trying to write
>a negated equivalence operator. Yeah, especially those who can master <>
>instead of !=. They'll initially try <><> or <<>>, then !=!= or !!== or
>!==... When (or perhaps if?) they'll come to "not <a> == <b>", our support
>list will die.
>
>
>Dmitry
>
>

Maybe I will be the first one to mess this up, I suggested Updated()
inside trigers, but have agreed that something that could be used
outside triggers will be far more usefull, so the == operator seems ok
to me, but I have expected the !== counterpart, that on my view is more
direct than not(ColumnA == ColumnB).

see you !

--

Alexandre Benson Smith
Development
THOR Software e Comercial Ltda.
Santo Andre - Sao Paulo - Brazil
www.thorsoftware.com.br