Kevin Lingofelter wrote:

>While, of course, this is true, isn't the distilled purpose of
>security is to "keep the honest people honest"? ANY security mechanism
>is breakable, given enough time and resourses.
>
>
>

Popular misconception. A robust security architecture is secure
provided explicit controls are managed responsibly, plus or minus
availability of an infeasible computational facility. You give me an
epsolon, I'll give you a delta..