> > I could not agree more strongly.
>
> I then think we are perfectly in-sync with this, I just slipped on a
> word whose exact accepted meaning in english wasn't what I thought it
> was.

Since I've found the English usage of your postings to be very good, I
took your use of "weak" literally -- perhaps I was too sensitive to the
word choice -- I didn't factor in the 'translation' factor, I apologize!

Let's not worry about this any more -- it will make for an interesting
exchange between us over a beer at the next user conference.


Sean