Geoff Worboys wrote:

> You seem to be under the impression that I want to change the
> behaviour of defaults. Go back to my original posting (not
> just the reply to Jim) and you will see that what I want is
> a new variation of DEFAULT behaviour. Something that does
> not change existing databases, but allows new databases to
> be created that can avoid this problem - and to also allow
> the other advantages I describe to be realised.

Ok, I see the idea now.

--
Milan Babuskov
http://fbexport.sourceforge.net
http://www.flamerobin.org