Alexandre Benson Smith wrote:

>Jonathan Neve wrote:
>
>
>
>>Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>I was only suggesting adding an operator, not changing the existing
>>behaviour. I understand that you would not want to do the latter, but
>>what's wrong with the former?
>>
>>Jonathan Neve.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>I agree that Coalesce fits well here, no need for another operator
>
>

Alright then. Actually, I must admit that I'm not familiar with
Coalesce()... what does it do exactly?

Thanks!
Jonathan Neve.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]