Subject | Re: [Firebird-Architect] Some Sugestions for Roles |
---|---|
Author | Martijn Tonies |
Post date | 2004-07-29T20:21:21Z |
Hi,
standard. A bit strange, true, but standard.
Perhaps, when security gets renewed, a GROUP would be
better. Any (server or database)user can be a member of
one or more groups. Each group can have rights granted to
it.
With regards,
Martijn Tonies
Database Workbench - developer tool for InterBase, Firebird, MySQL & MS SQL
Server.
Upscene Productions
http://www.upscene.com
> Roles only get effective when you specify it during connections.The current ROLE mechanism works according to the SQL
> Firebird seems to work this way because you can have as much roles as
> you like, so the DB cannot decide which one to use.
>
> I would like to suggest one "Default Role" or a Role that gets
> effective automatically. So, you can choose between an Active or
> Passive role when creating a new role.
>
> It would be very usefull for managing grants for groups of users, like
> I have here.
>
> Please, feel free for comment this sugestion.
standard. A bit strange, true, but standard.
Perhaps, when security gets renewed, a GROUP would be
better. Any (server or database)user can be a member of
one or more groups. Each group can have rights granted to
it.
With regards,
Martijn Tonies
Database Workbench - developer tool for InterBase, Firebird, MySQL & MS SQL
Server.
Upscene Productions
http://www.upscene.com