| Subject | Re: rdb$db_key in either XSQLDA or XSQLVAR |
|---|---|
| Author | Roman Rokytskyy |
| Post date | 2004-04-29T21:13:15Z |
> I think it would creating yet another version of the XSQLDA that wouldOne more question: what are XSQLDA.sqldaid and XSQLDA.sqldabc fields
> need to be supported in perpetuity for no gain.
for? API Reference says "Reserved for future use". 8 bytes of
rdb$db_key and 4 bytes of record version fit nicely here. Maybe it is
already that very "future use"?
Roman