Vlad Horsun wrote:

>>I continue to think we should have a standalone program to do to
>>existing databases what the procedure compiler will do in future
>>databases. An I also think that gpre should be extended to backup and
>>restore rdb$procedure_type.
>>
>>
>
> Gbak, not gpre, right ?
>
> Can gbak be that standalone program ? I.e. when backup don't
>have rdb$procedure_type, or have it with NULL's gbak can fill
>rdb$procedure_type at restore time.
>
>
>

Yes, gbak. Sure, gbak could. But until we get around a extending gbak,
a separate program can fill the void.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]