Subject | Re: [Firebird-Architect] RFC: Please unify stored procedure |
---|---|
Author | Ann W. Harrison |
Post date | 2004-12-21T19:53:35Z |
At 01:14 PM 12/21/2004, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
thingy called a "result set" into the API is going to be
easy either.
Regards,
Ann
>"Ann W. Harrison" <aharrison@...> wrote:I'm not sure that the effect of introducing a new return
> >
> > You'll find that xxxx has an output parameter, but returns
> > no values when executed from a select.
>
>This is the only problem in this discussion, IMO. Should be {CALL} XXXX
>described as select or execute? If the former, should it return one row or
>an empty set? I'm afraid that Roman wants one row and this will require some
>changes in the engine which I'd very much like to avoid.
thingy called a "result set" into the API is going to be
easy either.
Regards,
Ann