Subject Re: [Firebird-Architect] Re: RFC: Please unify stored procedure execution
Author Nando Dessena
Martijn,

>> This doesn't make sense or I can't get it. I don't know what does isql
>> have to do with the issue at hand and the last sentence is, well,
>> useless. Can you explain why is a necessity to accept that people do
>> things against documentation and write stored procedure with RETURNS
>> clauses but without SUSPEND statements?

M> How about an executable procedure with output parameters?

Does it work (i.e. does it output the parameters) without a suspend?

Ciao
--
Nando Dessena
http://www.flamerobin.org