|Subject||Re: RFC: Please unify stored procedure execution|
> I agree. What Roman is asking for is complete reasonable. It makesNow the question is how to set that flag? Should we change the
> all the sense in the world to extend RDB$PROCEDURES to include
> something about what the procedure returns. RDB$PROCEDURE_TYPE is the
> obvious candate.
procedure syntax to include RETURNS RESULT SET?
I ask this because in Russian newsgroup it was showed that checking
the procedure code for SUSPEND does not mean automatically that
procedure is selectable.
> That said, I'm afraid that FB2 has already left the station.If there is a general agreement, I think we can add it later. AFAIK,
adding a field to a system table is minor ODS change.